It's taken so long to get this far that I've forgotten what I wanted to say.
-
Do I get a Prize for Logging On?
@ 2007-01-31 – 19:47:06
-
ACOMPLIA IS DANGEROUS
@ 2007-01-31 – 09:35:12
Acomplia, the new, Spam based anti-obesity drug has dangerous and possibly fatal side effects.
Attempts to market the drug on BCUK are now been ridiculed. "What wankers," exclaimed one blogger. "So they've made the Most Popular Tag List? Get a life."
Bloating and an unjustified feeling of grotesque self importance can be caused by such relentless, repetetive and anally retentive posts on the Blog.co.uk website, says an expert who I have invented.
"Exposure like this can lead to derision and ridicule," according to a leading bullshitter, just as authorative as any Acomplia can muster. "This kind of parasitic blogging is counter productive, and a sad reflection on the quality of the product."
-
Blair/The Importance
@ 2007-01-30 – 20:26:13
Haircut today a lot to go after 8 weeks - then walk round Covent Garden, small lunch, quite visit to the National Gallery - a walk to Westminster Underground Station.
Halfway down Whitehall, a motorcycle policeman is making some strange balletic gestures. He looks like a clownish actor in a bad Italian film.
He's stopping the traffic.
A convoy of three cars drives, very slowly, out of Downing Street. I can't see who is inside, but they all look important. I assume one of them is Blair, but I later see on the News that he gave lunch to Sarkovsky, the Thatcherite candidate in the French Presidential elections (his main opponent is Ms Royale a centre-left "socialist", so Sarkovsky is logically Balir's new best friend).
How self satisying must it be, to have traffic stopped for you, day after day. How pleasantly cut off from real life you must feel. Or have you forgotten about real life?
And how safe. Arguably, you and I are more likely to be killed by violent opponents of Blair's policies than he is.
-
The Art of Revision
@ 2007-01-29 – 20:09:10
As I continue to hack superflous words and phrases out of my novel, I keep remembering advice from my sardonic sixth-form history teacher:
Take extensive notes.
Then make notes on your notes
Then notes on the notes of the notes...
And notes on...
Be careful not to go too far. You could land up with just one word; and then forget it.
-
Murder, for toddlers
@ 2007-01-29 – 16:26:22
In a break from writing for a late lunch, I turn on Channel 4 to take my mind off a problem I'm having with the next sentence.
There's an old Western playing. Almost immediatly, our heroes shoot half a dozen guys dead in a bar.
Watch with Mother. Great family viewing. We take this sort of thing for granted.
Yet, it's against the TV Guidelines - any time of the day or night - to show corpses on the News. Sometimes, it's true, in Bagdad, there's no avoiding them - but producers go to great efforts to cut dead bodies out of transmitted footage as much as possible.
Cowboys - fiction - that's different. Pistol killings hardly rate as what the regulators call "moderate violence." All that matters is that we don't see any pain suffered. And no regrets, minimal grieving.
A great message for children. Good entertainment before Countdown. Sanitised homicide.
What a strange culture we live in.
-
Eternity, possibly - not a joke
@ 2007-01-28 – 22:21:56
Some of you may remember my post Eternity Still Sucks, about 3 weeks back. I fantasised about what it would be like to live forever, and got some interesting Comments.
Well, it turns out it may be physically possible.
I'm serious. Or rather Bryan Appleyard is. He's written a new book called How to Live Forever or Die Trying: On the New Immortality.(Simon and Schuster £12.99) He argues that, with current and near-future developments in medicine, there is no need for us to fall apart and stop working.
Appleyard, and others, apparently believe in what they call "medical immortality" - swould still be killable by violence or accident, but otherwise able to go on and on. And on.
Apparently, with medical advances, we wold soon be able to go back to being... say 29 (or get there first if you are a younger reader)
There was a review in the Guardian yesterday. I will try and add a link later.
Strange.
What would be your own ideal age?
-
Sundays/Federer
@ 2007-01-28 – 21:00:32
Sundays used to be easily the worst day of the week for me - as I think it can be for people who live on their own.
This all began to change about March time last year, when I got into blogging big time. And now, blogging or not, it rarely feel such a downer.
Even today, when an IBS attack stopped my creativity right in its tracks. Even writing here felt impossible till now. (memo: avoid bread, all the time)
My good feelings helped by the Australian Open Tennis Final, live from 8.30 this morning on the (marxist, ha, ha) BBC. Federer was amazing as usual (strangely, though, when he plays you can hardly ever see his eyes), but his opponent, Golzales, a Chilean gave as give as he's got (very fluent in the rallies) and was occasionally brilliant.
I liked the exhuberance of the Chilian fans - of course, Melbourne is nearer to Chile than it is to Switzerland.
The only negative was the Brits commentating - two never-have-been-greats, hypnotised by Federer. We needed Macinroe or Becker.
Yes, Federer is a genius - but the racket are so light and fast these days (even I can hit an occasionally decent shot). He could never had played the way he does in Connor's or John Mac's day, even Sampras'.
But I'm realistic. they'll never make me a tennis commentator.
-
In my own name
@ 2007-01-27 – 20:38:26
A dreadful day down in Surrey with my mother; she made me feel like an unsatisfactory teenager. Little snappy complaints, sly comparisons with my succesful, caring, never-hotheaded sister, cross examination about my apparently empty lifestyle. (Perhaps like a teenager, I imagined it all) Unlike a teenager I did lots of washing up, shopping, and sorted out her financial papers
She refuses - as she has for years, though more unnecesarily by each monthly banks statement - to believe she has enough money to live quite well and without constant anxiety. But that means she would be no longer a victim - and she has built her whole life on this.
I do want to say more, much more - but I am totally done in from the emotional experience - and getting up too early to catch the train etc. I may write more on the subject tomorrow - or I may have moved on.
But I took a decision I may later regret (reverse it if I don't blog it for the world to see). If I do get my novel published, it's going to have my own name on it. And if it precipitates horror, disbelief and disgrace by association down in Motherland, so be it.
I've spent too many years trying not to write about my family - so I've written about prostitution instead. Hmm.
-
The Art of Not Blogging 2
@ 2007-01-26 – 19:12:56
It's easy, when I put my mind to it.
Two good days novel writing.... business, other stuff too.
-
Staircase
@ 2007-01-24 – 18:17:31
When I'm full writing flow, I do a lot of pacing.
A few words, maybe a sentence, then downstairs, a lot of pacing, then back up the staircase to my keyboard.
The creative process takes longer than it used to, even a few months ago. But I think I'm making fewer mistakes. More important, I'm beating myself far less. Growing older but - incredibly - less grumpy.
Leopard spot-changing?
That's about all - except that the birds outside the window sang throughout my sleepless night, despite the snow. By midday, in West London it had all melted
-
Lucinda... at last at LHR
@ 2007-01-24 – 00:36:20
Of course I never heard any more from the woman I'd met on the train. But the name 'Lucinda' kept running round my head.
I became obsessed. In the shower I adapted the song from West Side Story:
Lucinda, Lucinda, Lucinda!
Sing it loud and there's music playing,
Sing it soft and it's almost like praying..How sad is that? I joined a couple of Lonely Hearts sites. No Lucindas there - a couple of Lucys and Lucille, 18, an Arsenel fan, from Coulsdon.
One afternoon, in the French cafe I go to, I overheard the proprietor on the phone:
"Non, Lucinde, absollument pas."
But I might have misheard. Anyway I didn't think it was tactful to ask him about it.It was hopeless, of course.
Then I got a text. "Meet me at Heathrow tomorrow, T3 ex BA1622 x Lucinda"
It was a joke, a set up. I got to the arrival lounge early, held up a sign.
A woman of 35, 40 walked towards me, waving. Until I saw her eyes I didn't think she was particularly attractive. Her eyes were black and shiny. In colour they matched her short hair, tee shirt and jeans.
"This is ridiculous," she said. She kissed me, nibbled my lips. "I've never done that before," Lucinda claimed, pulling away after several erotic seconds. "I've decided to live life on the spur of the moment."
I couldn't think of anything to say. I couldn't place her accent.
"Look, I'm catching a flight to Berlin in a minute, but when I get back we can meet properly - if you like."
"Berlin?" I repeated stupidly. "When will you get back?"
"My husband wants to get together again." She shrugged her shoulders, pulled a face, gestured. "Perhaps a couple of days."
When we said good-bye, Lucinda said, "It could be fun, you and I. It could be disastrous." Her face seemed to light up when she said disastrous.
-
The Art of Not Blogging
@ 2007-01-23 – 23:12:45
If I don't blog here for 24 hours, it could well be because I've had a good day.
-
Not yet Lucinda
@ 2007-01-22 – 21:19:39
"Thanks for nothing." She clicked off her phone and looked at the guy sitting next to me. "You don't happen to have a room I could sleep in tonight. My friend has let me down."
We were on the way to King's Cross, stopped outside Stevenage for no apparent reason.
The guy pretended to be asleep. "I've got a room," I volunteered. I'd sleep on the couch.
"I'm not sure if I trust you."
"Suit yourself." I'd had bad luck with relationships when I was too obliging. Not that I was fantasising about a relationship.
We caught a taxi from King's Cross, although the tube might have been quicker. She wanted to make phone calls. By accident, I touched her thigh when the driver took a sharp corner fast. She raised an eyebrow.
She liked my house. She liked my waterbed. "Let's get this over and done with," she suggested. Her eyes said, "You'll have to do. I'm randy."
I was - shocked. It was a long time since anything remotely like this had happened to me.
Our sex was a disaster. Eventually she turned away and had a lonely climax. Myself, I didn't bother.
Afterwards, downstairs, whisky in hand, she looked almost happy. "You'd love my friend, Lucinda,' she told me.
"Really?" I couldn't imagine loving a friend of hers. "Lucinda?"
"I'll introduce you."
-
Tennis, Not British
@ 2007-01-22 – 17:46:42
Despite my rather desperate attempt to be upbeat about today (see below), January 22nd has been dubbed by some self appointed expert thee most depressing day of the year. And I slept very badly (the usual abreaction to an accupunture treatment. I still have touching faith it has a long term affect of making me better).
Nevertheless, the tennis cheered me up. For four hours - until almost 3pm - 2am Tuesday in Melbourne - BBC-2 realyed the spellbinding match between Raphael Nadal and Andy Murray.
Long-term readers of this blog may recall I confessed to a homophobic crush on Rapha during last year's Wimbledon. He ability never to give up, to get every ball is prodigious - but Murray matched a lot of this. Incredible rallies, angled shots. The 6-1 first set score didn't reflect how close the Scot (lease pleasing to watch, but very inventive and varied in his game) came to winning.
Andy Murray is the first UK player in my lifetime who plays tennis and not 'British'. He never creates the impression that when he wins it's only as a prelude to failure. One is never tempted to crouch behind the sofa in embarassment. He's nothing like Hemman, Jeremy Bates before him. Mottram, Virginia Wade... He's nothing like most of British sport.
Still, I'm glad Rapha Nadal won. Not my pin-up, but my hero. Courage, concentration, adaptabily and persistence (aka patience) are qualities I'd like to have more of. Unfortunately I've passed the optimm age for wearing a cut-off tee shirt
-
The 4th False Start of the Year/
@ 2007-01-22 – 00:07:29
Okay - this is the 4th Monday in 2007.
Is this going to be the real New Years Day at last?
The start of the year proper?
No fireworks please - just a bit of energy, optimism and excitement
-
15 months
@ 2007-01-21 – 19:22:26
I have been blogging here for fifteen months (while trying to finish a novel). Still a lot to declare - and some buzz, sometimes - of sending stuff, instantly, into the blogosphere.
But, at the moment I haven't got time to give my full attention - especially for those autobiog posts I enjoy writing.
One of the reason I began to blog was to break the spell of loneliness, hyperintrospection - and, lets face it self pity. Most of my early posts do now read back very sollemn.
Now - with occasional lapses - I feel differently about myself. And blogging doesn't feel so - necessary.
I don't want to finish in anti-climax (let alone a wimper). Or a bang, without warning.
But I do wonder how much longer I will keep this site open.
-
Trouble in Motherland
@ 2007-01-20 – 20:54:07
The for the first time in ages my weekly visit to my mother went really badly. Perhaps it was I was in too good a mood when I arrived.
She has good reasons to feel down. Her sight has got bad - hard to read. She's lost a front tooth - bad for her self esteem and worse for her ability to eat. And she is Worried about my sister's impending holiday in India - planes crashes, indigestibel food, dreadful things that happen in the Third World. Justified or not, I accept that this is the way she feels (although announcing she would like a pill to send her asleep for the ten days sis is away is, in my view, a little over the top).
But what got to me today is the way she expresses all this distress. Constantly judgemental. Mean with money. (eg, with £500k in savings, refusing to buy Optrex because it's too expensive. I would have given her some, but there was none on the supermarket shelves.
Annoyed at me, mainly for not being predictable (eg, absurdly, that sometimes I put the supermarket receipt in my pocket and sometimes in a shopping bag - although I always know where it is).
Mainipulating her son and daughter's guilt. (in my case, unsuccesfully)
Enough already. A blow by blow account (remembering her selective deaffness) would read like a bad Pinter play.
And there no "blows". No outbursts of temper from me, no overt hysterics from her.
Okay. I know. She's 91 and a half. But her mind's still there - worrying, following the news, worrying, questioning, doing the Times crossword.
I fear she is going to have a terrible death.
And my sister and I will be there, to the end.
-
Refutations and Conjectures
@ 2007-01-19 – 20:51:01
Ruth Taylor, the senior Blair aide arrested in connection the Cash for Peerages investigation early this morning, said on release on bail, "I absolutely refute the allegations."
Well maybe she will be able to refute the allegation. (Refuting is zero sum - you either can or you can't, so absolutely doesn't come into it.) Refuting involves producing a proof that something isn't true. And so far she has proved nothing except that she misuses words.
In court in this country, someone is found not guilty if there are thought to be grounds for reasonable doubt. So if Ruth is put on trial, her lawyer won't even have refute the charges, only convince the jury there is doubt.
So what? It's not just a matter of pedantry, or legal splitting hairs. The word 'refute' meaning denial is often misused by (self) important people in this country when facing accusations or criminal charges. It makes them appear to be so certain - who could doubt their innocence? "I deny the charges" sounds in contrast defensive, halfway to an admission of guilt.
It's symptomatic of the Blair Way - trusting the rich and powerful (getting loans from them, luxury holidays etc.). When Blair announced that the Seroius Fraud Office had been ordered to stop investigation of the Saudi Arabian Scandal he said "anyway" both British Aerospace and Saudi Arabia disputed the charges there was little point in persuing the matter any further. In other (unspoken) words, their denial was almost as good as... well a refutation.
In fact the evidence against them seems pretty substantial.
A suspect benefit cheet on the other hand... "I absolutely refute the charges" Unless s/he produced prood s/he'd be a laughing stock.
Did anyone see The Trial of Tony Blair last night? Wonderful
-
Not yet
@ 2007-01-19 – 18:07:44
Someone has sent me a Personal Message, asking about Lucinda.
The fact is, I haven't met her yet.
-
"Oh Alec!"
@ 2007-01-18 – 20:21:02
Never one to shirk criticism, I am republishing the relevant bit of a post of my Friend, msphullat , about our meeting yesterday. I enjoyed meeting her very much, but am not going to write about. it - except to say I don't recall using the word 'bland'; & I don't say "P.C". But then I wasn't taking detailed mental notes. Bland is the exact opposite of my impression.
Why should I be nervous?
Enjoying the communication with this blog friend has engaged me in a dialogue with a human being I might never have had, unlikely we should have connected merely in passing and there is nowhere our worlds would collide.
So we met here in Blogland, sharing pages, stories, opinions, emotions, work and then phone calls continued the dialogue.
Now we were to meet.
He chose the venue, but had the greater `distance to travel. I had chosen a very central hotel, easing my various errands around the city. He arrived he said to the pavement outside closed by workmen, but good fortune, they had completed their task on his arrival and allowed him entry to the delightful interior, and he, alone, could enjoy the singular attention of the being the solitary customer on a wet and busy Wednesday morning on Charing Cross Rd. Thus on my arrival he appeared to be in good humour.
Easily identifiable from the photo on his blog, he seemed also to recognize me easily, though to be fair I am very unlike my photo. Meaning the photo is of me, but taken at a very flattering angle and with delicious lighting. The first problem soon emerged.
“You are whiter (yes whiter, not lighter or paler you will note) than I expected” being preceded by “ of course this may be very unPC but..” didn’t make it any less offensive! However I can only assume in an attempt to redeem himself he added “and more bland!”
Did I recover from this onslaught well? Did I f*!
In fact I remained battered by this attack on my self esteem through the following 2 hours, dear Alec, can you chat! And Chat. And Chat! In a state of shock, managing to squeeze out a feeble, “sorry I’m not the exotic creature of your imagination” by way of riposte, my wit did not sparkle, nor my conversation amuse (not even me, which is highly unusual, because if nothing else ,I do enjoy my own humour even at the worst of times!) and my normally animated persona settled into a dullness. Out of a politeness and continued regard to his effort to meet me, I remained in the café, ate Latka and humous, drank mint tea and listened.
At first, I had difficulty reconciling the voice and the face as a moving speaking whole, having achieved this, I found myself considering whether the whole held any attractiveness for me. Obviously given his initial assault I wasn’t best placed to find him pleasing. He retains more of the air of a camp old bugger than I expected, his movements falling just short of foppish, and his constant self regard being palpably evident throughout our exchange. His eyes are blue, but age has dulled their rigour I think, they did not hold the cut of intelligence I was expecting, a remnant of cunning perhaps and that disengaging self satisfaction. Oh Alec, how harsh am I! call me white ever again and watch out you b*!
Okay, I have a grip! I am considering finding something kind to say. I am not inclined to make much effort in this direction at this time
-
If I could live twice...
@ 2007-01-18 – 13:04:00
Okay - eternal life on earth might or might not turn out to be hellish, but - with our body parts wearing out the way they do - pretty impractical. No luck with an e-bay solution so far.
And perpetual re-incarnation - frankly I do find it hard to believe in.
However, the thought that this is our only chance of life is pretty scary.
Best of all would be two chances - the first time a rehearsal.
To quote Anthony Newley:
If I could live twice,
I'd make life paradise
For someone really nice
Like you, Evie.Though I doubt if I'd choose someone called Evie. And, come to think of it, most of my Rehearsal-life girlfriends have prefered to inhabit hell or purgatory. So next time around, I might concentrate more on making life Paradise for Alec Weston.
Selfish bastard.
-
Sharing a Bed. A Clarification
@ 2007-01-17 – 20:32:53
Some readers may have misconstrued a statement in a recent post, Introducing Lucinda.
I'm tired of sleeping on my own could have have led you to think I was mainly interested in warmth and comfort.
Not so.
One Comment - that I get a cat - was kindly meant but way off the mark. I have spent too many years having more or less chaste relationships with women to settle for any more. I can tell you, regular sharing a bed with someone you fancy but who doesn't want sex is a bummer.
So I'm hoping my affair with Lucinda turns out differently. The omens are promising so far.
-
The Birds have stopped singing
@ 2007-01-17 – 05:39:36
... after all this time. Quite unnerving.
I think it was the silence that work me up.
-
Introducing Lucinda
@ 2007-01-16 – 21:16:36
I'm tired of sleeping on my own.
Time Killing Kid thinks I have a full size inflatable doll for company. Pleease! I don't want sex with escort girls any more. Besides all the better reasons, they are expensive.
My life needs a lot more passion.
So, until I meet a real life soul and body mate, Lucinda is to be my Virtual Girlfriend.
Virtual, that is ficitious, fantasised - though not necesarily perfect. My genre is passionate realism.
This post is the only time I will mention Lucinda is made up, although I expect to tell you more about her - and us - as time goes on. I'll tell you if - and when - we break up. (Hopefully because of a real woman's jealous demands)
I have yet to decide how I met Lucinda. Lots of details are unclear... In fact, pretty well everything. I'd be delighted to have your suggestions.
Pathetic? Possibly. But honest. I've got to start somewhere. Where better than Fantasy Land?
-
Any old excuse to blog
@ 2007-01-16 – 18:56:43
I just had a long, friendly phone conversation with my sister. It doesn't happen often. As usual she is full of energy, guilt and panic. For once I think she appreciated my support. When our mother dies, sis still insists she will contemplate suicide, but nowadays she insists less often.
And that's about it really. After another long day of intense writing, I don't feel much like inputing stuff here...
Except that whatever I blog can be read within seconds, perhaps by a stranger (compare and contrast with a novel without a signed-up publisher).
It would be nice to know that someone was ot there - Friend, passer-by, foe.
Hi.
-
Short Bulletin from Exhaustionville
@ 2007-01-15 – 21:55:42
In fact my writing went pretty well yesterday and today - after a creative mini-crisis at the start. But it sure leaves me exhausted - as if I'm drawing on creativity and emotions inside me I never knew I had.
That, or I have undiagnosed disease.
Anyway, for now, that's all I have energy to write.
-
Transitional Block
@ 2007-01-15 – 11:31:55
More tha hree quarters of my novel-writing delays occur when I am trying too write transitional packages - the start of a chapter, a link between two sections.
In terms of frustration time, 90%, 95%.
This morning, as so often, I know exactly what I want to write in 2 paragraphs' time. I just can't get there yet.
So why not skip the first two paragraps for now and gone with it?Because then the third para becomes the first and the problem starts all over again.
Argh!!!!!! Is this a problem most novelists have? Is there an oedipal explanation? A drug I can take?